Full Endoscopic Lumbar Fusion

I do not fuse a spine lightly, and most back and leg pain does not need a fusion at all. I consider it when a segment is unstable — for example a degenerative slip (spondylolisthesis), or where freeing a badly trapped nerve requires removing enough bone or joint that the level would be left unstable. Traditionally a fusion of this kind meant a sizeable operation with significant muscle stripping. The appeal of the full-endoscopic approach is that it delivers the same essential goals — decompressing the nerve and fusing the segment with a cage — through a single small portal under continuous saline irrigation and magnified endoscopic vision, sparing much of the muscle and soft tissue. It is technically demanding and suits carefully selected one- or two-level problems.

Through a small portal, the endoscope and fine instruments are passed to the spine, usually via the transforaminal corridor known as Kambin's triangle, or by a posterolateral route. Under magnified, irrigated vision I decompress the trapped nerve, clear the degenerated disc and prepare the endplates, and then insert an interbody cage packed with bone graft to restore height, open the nerve channels and provide a scaffold for fusion. The construct is generally supported with percutaneous pedicle screws placed through tiny incisions, so the whole reconstruction is achieved without the large muscle-stripping exposure of a traditional open fusion. Because the working space and the nerves are seen at high magnification throughout, the technique emphasises precise, controlled decompression.

Full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion is a newer, evolving technique, and the evidence base is growing steadily. Technical descriptions and review articles document how the operation is performed and refined, and systematic reviews of trans-Kambin and full-endoscopic interbody fusion report encouraging fusion rates and good improvements in pain and function, with the expected advantages of less tissue trauma, alongside a recognised learning curve. The honest, balanced position is that this is a promising, minimally invasive way to achieve fusion in well-selected patients, best done by surgeons experienced in endoscopic spine surgery, and that it complements rather than replaces established fusion techniques.

Full-endoscopic lumbar fusion is carried out under anaesthetic, and because the muscle disruption is much less than a traditional open fusion, many people are up and moving quickly and the hospital stay is often short. The cage and screws provide immediate stability while the fusion itself becomes solid over the following months, supported by a graded return to activity and rehabilitation. As with any fusion there are risks, and the technique is demanding, so careful patient selection matters; all of this is discussed fully beforehand, and whether an endoscopic fusion — as opposed to another approach — is right for you is decided together.

• —Pholprajug P, et al. The endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: a narrative review and future perspective. Neurospine 2023. (PMID 38171291)
• —Nakajima Y, et al. Full-endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a review and technical note. World Neurosurg 2024. (PMID 38960311)
• —Morimoto M, et al. Clinical outcome of full-endoscopic trans-Kambin's triangle lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2023. (PMID 37453727)
• —Youn MS, et al. Full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FELIF): technical note. Eur Spine J 2018. (PMID 29445951)
• —Ishihama Y, et al. Full-endoscopic trans-Kambin triangle lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and nomenclature. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2022. (PMID 34808676)
• —Sharma M, et al. Full-endoscopic lumbar transforaminal interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative disc disease. Int J Spine Surg 2021. (PMID 33900948)