Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (Persistent Spinal Pain After Surgery)

A condition guide by Mr Mohammed Madi, Consultant Orthopaedic & Spinal Surgeon.

Failed back surgery syndrome is the name traditionally given to persistent or recurrent back or leg pain that continues, or returns, after spinal surgery. I want to say two things about it straight away. First, the name is misleading and is being replaced, because in many cases the operation did exactly what it was meant to do, and the pain persists for other reasons that have nothing to do with the surgeon or the patient having failed. The modern term is persistent spinal pain syndrome. Second, and more hopefully: this is a description of a pain state with many possible causes, not a dead end. The key to helping is a careful search for any specific, treatable cause, followed by an individualised plan — and there are genuinely effective options.

Failed back surgery syndrome describes ongoing back and/or leg pain after one or more spinal operations — most often surgery on the lower back, such as a decompression, a discectomy or a fusion — where the pain did not settle as hoped, or where it returned later. The international pain community now prefers the term persistent spinal pain syndrome, type 2, precisely because the old name unfairly implies that the operation or the people involved failed. Often the surgery achieved exactly what it set out to do — for example, freeing a trapped nerve — and yet pain remains, for reasons explained below. The most useful way to think about it is not as a single diagnosis, but as a pain state that prompts a careful search for its cause.

In plain terms: it means pain that carries on, or comes back, after spinal surgery. The name is being changed because the surgery often did not "fail" — the pain simply continued for other reasons, and the job now is to find out why and to help.

Persistent pain after spinal surgery is, unfortunately, not rare. Estimates vary widely depending on the type of operation and how the pain is defined, but figures in the range of roughly one in ten to four in ten patients are commonly quoted, with higher rates after fusion and after repeat operations than after a simple discectomy. It is an important cause of ongoing pain and reduced quality of life, and the numbers matter less than the principle: it is common enough that it should be talked about openly before any surgery, and approached constructively when it happens.

This is the heart of the matter, because the causes are varied and often act together. It helps to group them.

Sometimes the original surgery was not aimed at the true source of the pain — the wrong target was treated, or the pain was coming from more than one place, or expectations of what surgery could achieve were higher than what was realistic. Sometimes a nerve remains compressed: there may be residual narrowing, a recurrent disc herniation, or narrowing of the exit canal of the nerve (foraminal stenosis) that was not fully relieved. Scar tissue can form around a nerve root after surgery. New problems can develop: the segments next to a fusion can wear (adjacent segment degeneration), the spine can become unstable, a fusion can fail to unite (pseudarthrosis), or there can be a problem with the metalwork. The pain can also be neuropathic — a nerve that was compressed for a long time may stay painful even after it is freed, and pain can become, in effect, wired into the nervous system. Other sources, such as the sacroiliac joint, the facet joints or deconditioned muscles, can contribute. And psychological and social factors — low mood, anxiety, fear of movement, and difficult work or compensation situations — have a strong influence on how pain is experienced and on recovery. None of this means the pain is imagined; it means that mind and body both matter.

The symptoms are persistent or recurrent back pain, leg pain, or both, that did not resolve or that returned after surgery. The leg pain may be the radiating, sciatica-type pain of a trapped nerve, or a more diffuse referred pain, and it often has a neuropathic quality — burning, shooting, tingling or numbness. Many people have a mixture of mechanical back pain and neuropathic leg pain. The pattern gives useful clues: leg-dominant pain points more towards ongoing nerve compression, while back-dominant pain points more towards the joints, the discs or the muscles.

Some symptoms need urgent attention. New or worsening weakness or numbness in the legs, numbness around the saddle area, or any new disturbance of bladder or bowel control can indicate serious nerve compression (cauda equina syndrome) and is a medical emergency. In the weeks after surgery, fever, discharge from the wound, or rapidly escalating pain may indicate an infection and need prompt assessment. Most persistent post-operative pain is not an emergency, but these particular features always warrant immediate review because they can point to a treatable structural cause.

The central task is to distinguish a specific, treatable cause from diffuse or neuropathic pain, because that determines what will help. This means a careful history — the pattern and timing of the pain, whether it is back- or leg-dominant, and its neuropathic features — and a review of the original operation and whether it was aimed at the right target, together with a full examination. Imaging is important: an MRI, often with contrast, is the key test, because contrast helps tell the difference between a recurrent disc and scar tissue around the nerve; a CT scan helps where there is metalwork or where bone detail and the state of a fusion need assessing; and standing bending X-rays show up instability. Diagnostic injections — around a nerve root, or into the facet or sacroiliac joints — can help identify exactly where the pain is coming from. Because mood and coping have such an influence on outcome, a psychological assessment is often a valuable part of the work-up, not as a suggestion that the pain is not real, but because addressing these factors genuinely helps.

For most people, the best results come from a multidisciplinary plan that combines physical, medical and psychological care, with realistic, function-focused goals. Structured physiotherapy and graded reconditioning help rebuild strength, tolerance and confidence. Pain medicines have a role, including medicines for neuropathic pain such as gabapentinoids or certain antidepressants, though I am always honest that their benefit is often modest and they have side effects; long-term strong opioids are best avoided, because the evidence for them in this situation is weak and the risks are significant. Psychological therapies, such as cognitive behavioural therapy and structured pain-management programmes, improve outcomes and can make other treatments work better. Where the assessment identifies a specific source — a facet joint, the sacroiliac joint, or an irritated nerve root — a targeted injection may help.

For people whose main problem is neuropathic leg pain that has not responded to other measures, spinal cord stimulation has the best evidence of any treatment in this situation. It involves an implanted device that delivers gentle electrical stimulation to the spinal cord to modulate and mask the pain. Crucially, it is always trialled first with a temporary lead, and a permanent device is only implanted if the trial gives meaningful relief. In the UK it is recommended for carefully selected people with chronic neuropathic pain that has persisted despite proper conventional treatment, assessed and provided by an experienced multidisciplinary team. It is not a cure-all, and it works better for leg pain than for back-dominant pain, but in the right person it can substantially improve pain and function.

Further surgery has a clear role — but only when there is a specific, surgically-correctable cause that matches the symptoms, such as a genuine recurrent disc with concordant leg pain, significant residual or adjacent narrowing, gross instability, or a failed fusion. In those situations, well-targeted revision surgery can be very effective. Where the imaging shows no clear structural target, however, repeat surgery for diffuse or back-dominant pain tends to disappoint, and risks rise with each operation. Honest, careful patient selection is everything.

The honest and hopeful position is this: persistent pain after spinal surgery is challenging, but many people improve a great deal with a careful, individualised, multidisciplinary plan focused on function — on better pain control, more movement and a better quality of life — even when complete cure is not possible. Finding a specific, treatable target offers the best chance of a good result from an intervention; where no clear target exists, the focus shifts to multidisciplinary pain management and, for suitable people with neuropathic leg pain, neuromodulation. The goal is realistic and achievable: not always to abolish the pain, but to reduce it and to help people live well.

"Another operation will fix it." Usually not — unless there is a clear structural target. Repeat surgery for diffuse pain tends to disappoint, and the risks rise with each operation.

"The pain is all in my head." No. The pain is real. But the mind and body interact, and mood, stress and coping genuinely affect pain — which is why psychological support is part of effective care, not a dismissal.

"Nothing can be done." Far from it — physiotherapy, multidisciplinary pain management, targeted injections, neuropathic medicines and spinal cord stimulation are all established, effective options.

"It means my surgery failed." Often the surgery achieved exactly what it was meant to; the pain persisted for other reasons. That is why the name is being changed.

"I should rest until it settles." Prolonged rest worsens deconditioning; graded activity is part of recovery.

Failed back surgery syndrome — better called persistent spinal pain syndrome — is ongoing or recurrent back or leg pain after spinal surgery. It is a pain state with many possible causes acting together, from residual nerve compression and scar tissue to new problems, neuropathic pain and psychological factors, rather than a single diagnosis or a sign that the surgery failed. The key is a careful search for any specific, treatable cause, using history, examination, MRI with contrast, and diagnostic injections. Most people are helped most by a multidisciplinary, function-focused plan; spinal cord stimulation has the best evidence for neuropathic leg pain; and revision surgery is reserved for a clear, correctable target. The warning signs that need urgent attention are new weakness or numbness, saddle numbness, bladder or bowel disturbance, or signs of infection after surgery.

This page is for general education only and is not a substitute for individual medical advice. Features that warrant urgent assessment include new or worsening leg weakness or numbness, numbness around the saddle area, any disturbance of bladder or bowel control, or signs of infection (fever, wound discharge) after surgery.

• —Orhurhu VJ, Chu R, Gill J. Failed Back Surgery Syndrome. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
• —Christelis N, Simpson B, Russo M, et al. Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Proposal for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome and ICD-11. Pain Medicine. 2021;22(4):807–818.
• —Simpson BA, Russo M, Bull L, et al. Will persistent spinal pain syndrome replace failed back surgery syndrome? European Journal of Pain. 2021.
• —Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, et al. Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain (PROCESS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Pain. 2007;132(1–2):179–188.
• —North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA. Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(1):98–106.
• —National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain of neuropathic or ischaemic origin (TA159). 2008 (reviewed 2014).
• —Baber Z, Erdek MA. Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives. Journal of Pain Research. 2016;9:979–987.
• —Daniell JR, Osti OL. Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Review Article. Asian Spine Journal. 2018;12(2):372–379.
• —Thomson S. Failed back surgery syndrome — definition, epidemiology and demographics. British Journal of Pain. 2013;7(1):56–59.
• —Chan CW, Peng P. Failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Medicine. 2011;12(4):577–606.
• —Sebaaly A, Lahoud MJ, Rizkallah M, et al. Etiology, Evaluation, and Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome. Asian Spine Journal. 2018;12(3):574–585.
• —Sparkes E, Raphael JH, Duarte RV, et al. A systematic review of psychological characteristics as determinants of outcome for spinal cord stimulation. Pain. 2010;150(2):284–289.

This information is for general patient education and is not a substitute for an individual consultation. Always seek personalised advice from a qualified spinal specialist.