Thoracic Spine

The thoracic spine consists of twelve vertebrae, labelled T1 at the top, just below the neck, down to T12, where the ribs give way to the lumbar spine. They form the longest continuous region of the vertebral column, and they are recognisable by a set of features that no other vertebrae share.

The body of a typical thoracic vertebra is roughly heart-shaped when viewed from above, and it grows steadily larger from top to bottom, reflecting the increasing weight it has to carry as the load of the trunk accumulates towards the lower back. Behind the body lies the vertebral foramen, the bony ring that encloses and shields the spinal cord; in the thoracic region this canal is comparatively circular and relatively narrow. Projecting backwards is the spinous process, which in the thoracic spine is long, thin and angled sharply downwards, so that each one overlaps the one below like slates on a roof. This steep, overlapping arrangement is one of the several features that mechanically limit how far the region can bend backwards.

The truly defining feature, however, is the presence of costal facets: small, smooth articular surfaces that exist only on thoracic vertebrae and that exist for one purpose, to receive the ribs. On the sides of the vertebral bodies these facets are frequently split into pairs called demifacets, and on the transverse processes there are further facets. A single vertebra therefore carries several of these rib-bearing surfaces, and it is this rib coupling, more than anything else, that separates the mechanics of the thoracic spine from those of the neck and the lower back.

Each rib joins the spine through not one but two synovial joints, and understanding this dual attachment is central to understanding how the region is stabilised.

The first is the **costovertebral joint**, sometimes called the costocentral joint, where the rounded head of the rib meets the side of the vertebral body. For most of the ribs, the second through the ninth or tenth, the rib head sits across the junction between two adjacent vertebrae and the disc between them, articulating with the lower demifacet of the vertebra above and the upper demifacet of the vertebra below. So, for example, the head of the fifth rib meets the demifacets of both the fourth and the fifth vertebrae, straddling the disc between them. The first, tenth, eleventh and twelfth ribs are exceptions, each articulating with only a single vertebra. Within this joint a small intra-articular ligament tethers the rib head directly to the intervening disc.

The second is the **costotransverse joint**, where a bump on the rib, the tubercle, meets a facet on the transverse process of the vertebra. This joint is present for the first ten ribs but is absent for the eleventh and twelfth, which is one reason those lowest two ribs are described as floating.

These joints are reinforced by a set of strong ligaments. The radiate ligament fans out from the front of each rib head, sending fibres up to the vertebra above, across to the disc, and down to the vertebra below. At the costotransverse joint, several ligaments bind the neck and tubercle of the rib to the transverse process, and the lateral costotransverse ligament in particular is regarded as an especially strong stabiliser. Together these two joints and their ligaments anchor each rib firmly yet allow it a controlled, hinge-like movement, restraining the ribs so that they move in an orderly, parallel fashion during breathing.

Once each rib is anchored to the spine at the back and curves round to join the breastbone at the front, the whole assembly becomes a closed, semi-rigid box: the thoracic cage. This cage is not a passive shell sitting around the spine; it is a structural partner that transforms how the middle of the back behaves under load.

The stiffening effect is substantial and has been measured directly in laboratory studies on cadaveric spines. When the rib cage is present, the thoracic spine is markedly stiffer and moves less than when it is removed. In these experiments, taking the rib cage away increased the range of movement of the thoracic spine by roughly sixty per cent in bending forwards and backwards, in side-bending and in twisting. Put the other way round, the intact rib cage is responsible for a large share of the region's stiffness, contributing on the order of a third to nearly a half of the resistance to twisting, a sizeable fraction of the resistance to forward and backward bending, and roughly a third of the resistance to side-bending. The cage effectively converts a chain of individual vertebrae into a coherent, stabilised structure.

The load-sharing role follows naturally from this. Because the ribs and breastbone form a parallel pathway alongside the vertebral column, some of the force that would otherwise pass entirely through the discs and vertebral bodies is instead carried by the cage. Laboratory work has shown that an intact rib cage reduces the pressure inside the thoracic intervertebral discs under applied loads, precisely because the cage takes up part of the burden. The spine and the cage share the work.

The protective role is the one most people already know: the cage shields the heart, the lungs and the great vessels. From the spine's point of view there is an added benefit, because the same bony enclosure that protects the internal organs also helps to shield the spinal cord running down the middle of the region, adding an extra layer of mechanical protection to an area that is already relatively rigid.

Viewed from the side, the thoracic spine curves gently forwards, so that its convex side faces backwards. This curve is called the thoracic kyphosis, and it is one of the normal curves of the healthy spine, sitting between the backward-leaning lordosis of the neck above and the backward-leaning lordosis of the lower back below. Together these alternating curves give the spine its characteristic gentle S-shape when seen in profile.

This kyphosis is a primary curve, present from early development, and it arises partly because the thoracic vertebrae and their discs are slightly taller at the back than at the front, wedging the column into a forward bow. In younger adults the degree of curvature typically falls within a range of about twenty to forty degrees when measured on a side-on radiograph using the standard angular method. The curve tends to become a little more pronounced with advancing age.

Mechanically, the kyphosis matters because it positions the trunk's centre of gravity and determines how loads are distributed. A balanced kyphosis allows the head and trunk to be held upright over the pelvis with the least muscular effort, keeping the whole column in economical balance. The curve also works in concert with the rib cage and the facet joints to make the region behave the way it does, favouring stability and rotation over free bending.

Where two vertebrae meet at the back, they interlock through a pair of small joints called the facet, or zygapophyseal, joints. The angle at which these joints are set determines which movements a region of the spine will permit, and the thoracic facets are angled quite differently from those in the neck or the lower back.

In the typical thoracic vertebrae, roughly from T2 to T10, the facet joints are oriented close to the coronal plane, the flat plane that runs from side to side across the body. The upper facet surfaces face backwards, slightly upwards and a little outwards, while the lower surfaces of the vertebra above face the opposite way. Because these mating surfaces are arranged along an arc, one vertebra can pivot, or rotate, on the one below relatively freely: the facets slide past one another as the trunk twists. This is why the thoracic region is comparatively good at axial rotation. Laboratory and imaging studies place the thoracic spine among the more rotationally flexible regions of the column, with each level contributing a few degrees of twist.

The same coronal orientation that permits rotation acts as a brake on bending forwards and backwards. As the spine attempts to flex or extend, the facet surfaces quickly abut and block further movement, and the long, downward-pointing, overlapping spinous processes add a second bony restraint. The result is a region that twists reasonably well but bends forwards and backwards comparatively little at each level. It is worth noting that the very top and very bottom of the thoracic spine behave somewhat like their neighbours: the upper levels blend towards the character of the neck, and the thoracolumbar levels take on more of the flexion-and-extension character of the lumbar spine.

Pull these threads together and it becomes clear why the middle of the back is the most stable and least mobile part of the spine. Three factors reinforce one another. First, the facet joints are angled to permit rotation but to restrict bending. Second, the intervertebral discs here are relatively thin in proportion to the height of the vertebral bodies, and thinner discs allow less movement. Third, and most powerfully, the rib cage clamps the whole region into a semi-rigid box.

The contrast with the neighbouring regions is instructive. The neck, with no ribs and with facet joints angled to allow movement in every direction, is the most mobile part of the spine. The lower back, also free of a rib cage, permits generous bending forwards and backwards. The thoracic spine, uniquely braced by its ribs and stiffened by its geometry, sits between them as the anchor: comparatively rigid, resistant to bending, and able to serve as a stable platform. Each level moves only a little, but because there are twelve of them, modest movements at each add up to a useful total range across the region as a whole, particularly in rotation and side-bending.

This stability comes at a cost at the boundaries. Where the stiff, rib-braced thoracic spine meets the mobile lumbar spine, at the thoracolumbar junction around T10 to L2, there is an abrupt change in flexibility. The concentration of mechanical demand at this transition is one reason it is the region of the spine most often affected by injury under high loads.

The thoracic spine and its ribs are not only a structural framework; they are also the moving scaffold of respiration. Because each rib is hinged to the spine at two points, the costovertebral and costotransverse joints, it can only swing along a fixed axis set by the line joining those two joints. The orientation of that axis differs between the upper and lower ribs, and this produces two classic patterns of rib movement.

The upper ribs move in what is described as a **pump-handle** motion. Here the axis runs more from side to side, so that when the ribs are raised the front ends and the breastbone swing upwards and forwards, like the handle of an old water pump lifting. This increases the front-to-back, or anteroposterior, diameter of the chest.

The lower ribs move in a **bucket-handle** motion. Their axis runs more from front to back, so that raising them swings the middle portion of each rib outwards to the side, like lifting the handle of a bucket away from its rim. This increases the side-to-side, or transverse, diameter of the chest.

Both motions are driven largely by the intercostal muscles between the ribs, with the diaphragm working below. As the muscles contract and the ribs swing up and out, the volume enclosed by the chest increases in all directions. By a simple gas law, increasing the volume lowers the pressure inside the chest, and air flows in; relaxing the muscles reverses the process and air flows out. In this way the movement of the ribs on the thoracic spine, permitted and guided by the very joints that anchor them, is the mechanical engine of breathing. Because breathing continues ceaselessly, the costovertebral and costotransverse joints and their ligaments are among the most repetitively loaded structures in the whole skeleton.

The thoracic spine has two further roles that flow from its position and its rigidity: it protects the spinal cord along its length, and it forms the structural bridge between the neck and the lumbar spine.

Within the thoracic canal, the spinal cord runs on its way to the lower body. The relatively rigid, rib-braced construction of the region, combined with the bony enclosure of the canal, provides a stable and well-shielded conduit for the cord. It is worth noting, on the educational level, that the middle of the thoracic spine also has a comparatively slender canal and, in vascular terms, is regarded as a watershed area where the blood supply to the cord is relatively sparse; these are simply anatomical characteristics of the region and are described here only to explain its features.

As a connector, the thoracic spine performs a job that is easy to overlook precisely because it does it so quietly. The mobile neck above needs a stable base from which to move the head, and the mobile lower back below needs a stable summit from which to bear the trunk. The thoracic spine, anchored by its cage, provides both. It is the rigid central span from which the more mobile ends operate, transmitting the weight of the head, neck and arms down into the lumbar spine and pelvis, while holding the trunk upright around the organs it shelters. Its very stillness is what allows the rest of the spine to move to good effect.

The idea that recurs throughout the mechanics of this region is load sharing, and it deserves to be drawn together on its own. In most of the spine, the forces generated by gravity, posture and muscle action pass down through a single stacked column of vertebral bodies and discs at the front, with the facet joints taking a share at the back. In the thoracic region there is a third player: the rib cage, running in parallel with the spine and joined to it at every level.

Because the cage is attached to each vertebra by ribs, and because those ribs meet the breastbone at the front, the cage forms a continuous alternative pathway for force. When the trunk is loaded, part of that load is diverted into the ribs, the breastbone and the soft tissues of the chest wall, rather than being borne entirely by the discs and vertebral bodies. Laboratory studies capture this directly, showing that the pressure inside the thoracic discs is lower when the rib cage is intact than when it is removed. In effect, the spine and the cage carry the trunk together, each taking a portion.

This shared arrangement has consequences for stiffness as well as for pressure. The parallel cage resists twisting, bending and side-bending alongside the spinal column, which is why removing it in the laboratory so dramatically increases movement. The mid-back is best understood not as a spine surrounded by ribs but as a single integrated structure, a braced column, in which the vertebral column and the thoracic cage function as one load-sharing, motion-restraining, cord-protecting unit. That integration is the essence of thoracic spine biomechanics.

The thoracic spine is the long middle section of the backbone, made up of twelve vertebrae that lie between the flexible neck above and the mobile lower back below. It is the only part of the spine that carries ribs, and this single fact shapes almost everything about the way it works. Each thoracic vertebra connects to a pair of ribs, and those ribs curve round to meet the breastbone at the front, closing the region into a cage. That cage does far more than protect the heart and lungs. It stiffens the spine, shares the loads that pass through it, and turns the middle of the back into the most stable, least mobile part of the whole column. The thoracic spine also carries a gentle forward-leaning curve, the kyphosis, and its facet joints are angled in a way that allows the trunk to rotate while firmly restraining bending forwards and backwards. This page explains, in purely educational terms, how the mid-back is built and how it behaves mechanically. It contains no medical advice and describes the region in general terms only.

• —Panjabi MM, Oxland T, Takata K, Goel V, Duranceau J, Krag M. Articular facets of the human spine. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(10):1298-1310. PMID: 8211362. doi:10.1097/00007632-199308000-00009
• —Pal GP, Routal RV, Saggu SK. The orientation of the articular facets of the zygapophyseal joints at the cervical and upper thoracic region. J Anat. 2001;198(Pt 4):431-441. PMID: 11327205. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2001.19840431.x
• —Pal GP, Routal RV. The quantitative anatomy of the thoracic facet and the posterior projection of its inferior facet. J Anat. 1997;191(Pt 2):189-193. PMID: 9280016. doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.1997.19120189.x
• —Duprey S, Subit D, Guillemot H, Kent RW. Biomechanical properties of the costovertebral joint. Med Eng Phys. 2010;32(2):222-227. PMID: 20036178. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.12.001
• —Oda I, Abumi K, Lü D, Shono Y, Kaneda K. Biomechanical role of the intervertebral disc and costovertebral joint in stability of the thoracic spine. A canine model study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(12):1423-1429. PMID: 10423785.
• —Watkins R 4th, Watkins R 3rd, Williams L, Ahlbrand S, Garcia R, Karamanian A, et al. Stability provided by the sternum and rib cage in the thoracic spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(11):1283-1286. PMID: 15928553. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000164257.69354.bb
• —Liebsch C, Graf N, Appelt K, Wilke HJ. The rib cage stabilizes the human thoracic spine: An in vitro study using stepwise reduction of rib cage structures. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178733. PMID: 28570671. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178733
• —Mannen EM, Anderson JT, Arnold PM, Friis EA. The rib cage stiffens the thoracic spine in a cadaveric model with body weight load under dynamic moments. J Biomech. 2018;76:258-261. PMID: 29852313. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.037
• —Sis HL, Mannen EM, Wong BM, Cadel ES, Bouxsein ML, Anderson DE, et al. Effect of follower load on motion and stiffness of the human thoracic spine with intact rib cage. J Biomech. 2016;49(14):3252-3259. PMID: 27545081. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.08.003
• —Watkins R, Anderson DE, D'Andrea CR, Mannen EM, Friis EA, Arnold PM, et al. Effects of follower load and rib cage on intervertebral disc pressure and sagittal plane curvature in static tests of cadaveric thoracic spines. J Biomech. 2016;49(7):1078-1084. PMID: 26944690. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.038
• —Liebsch C, Graf N, Wilke HJ. The effect of follower load on the intersegmental coupled motion characteristics of the human thoracic spine: An in vitro study using entire rib cage specimens. J Biomech. 2018;78:36-44. PMID: 30031651. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.010
• —Wilke HJ, Herkommer A, Werner K, Liebsch C. In vitro analysis of the segmental flexibility of the thoracic spine. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177823. PMID: 28520819. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177823
• —Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Nagamoto Y, Ishii T, Kashii M, Murase T, et al. Kinematics of the thoracic spine in trunk rotation: in vivo 3-dimensional analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(21):E1318-E1328. PMID: 22772578. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318267254b
• —Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Nagamoto Y, Matsuo Y, Ishii T, Sugiura T, et al. Kinematics of the thoracic spine in trunk lateral bending: in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Spine J. 2014;14(9):1991-1999. PMID: 24333460. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.054
• —Willems JM, Jull GA, Ng JK. An in vivo study of the primary and coupled rotations of the thoracic spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996;11(6):311-316. PMID: 11415638. doi:10.1016/0268-0033(96)00017-4
• —Heneghan NR, Rushton A. Understanding why the thoracic region is the 'cinderella' region of the spine. Man Ther. 2016;21:274-276. PMID: 26365151. doi:10.1016/j.math.2015.06.001
• —Boyle JJ, Milne N, Singer KP. Influence of age on cervicothoracic spinal curvature: an ex vivo radiographic survey. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17(5):361-367. PMID: 12084538. doi:10.1016/s0268-0033(02)00030-x
• —Fon GT, Pitt MJ, Thies AC Jr. Thoracic kyphosis: range in normal subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980;134(5):979-983. PMID: 6768276. doi:10.2214/ajr.134.5.979
• —Koelé MC, Lems WF, Willems HC. The clinical relevance of hyperkyphosis: a narrative review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:5. PMID: 32063886. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00005
• —Bastir M, García-Martínez D, Torres-Tamayo N, Sanchis-Gimeno JA, O'Higgins P, Utrilla C, et al. In vivo 3D analysis of thoracic kinematics: Changes in size and shape during breathing and their implications for respiratory function in recent humans and fossil hominins. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017;300(2):255-264. PMID: 27762077. doi:10.1002/ar.23503
• —Wilson TA, Rehder K, Krayer S, Hoffman EA, Whitney CG, Rodarte JR. Geometry and respiratory displacement of human ribs. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987;62(5):1872-1877. PMID: 3597261. doi:10.1152/jappl.1987.62.5.1872
• —Beyer B, Sholukha V, Dugailly PM, Rooze M, Moiseev F, Feipel V, et al. In vivo thorax 3D modelling from costovertebral joint complex kinematics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014;29(4):434-438. PMID: 24529962. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.01.007
• —LoMauro A, Aliverti A. Movement of the ribs in supine humans for small and large changes in lung volume. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021;130(6):1794-1809. PMID: 34013751. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01046.2020
• —Singer KP, Edmondston SJ, Day RE, Breidahl WH. Computer-assisted curvature assessment and Cobb angle determination of the thoracic kyphosis. An in vivo and in vitro comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(12):1381-1384. PMID: 8066519. doi:10.1097/00007632-199406000-00012

This information is for general patient education and is not a substitute for an individual consultation. Always seek personalised advice from a qualified spinal specialist.