Adult Spinal Deformity

A condition guide by Mr Mohammed Madi, Consultant Orthopaedic & Spinal Surgeon.

Adult spinal deformity is an umbrella term for an abnormal shape or alignment of the spine in adult life — whether a sideways curve (scoliosis), a forward stoop (kyphosis), a loss of the normal lower-back curve, or a combination of these. What matters most in adults is not simply the size of a curve on an X-ray, but how well the spine remains balanced over the pelvis and hips, because it is loss of balance — particularly in the front-to-back, or sagittal, plane — that drives pain, fatigue and disability. This page explains what adult spinal deformity is, the all-important concept of spinal alignment and balance, how it is assessed, and how it is treated.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) describes any significant departure from the normal shape and alignment of the adult spine. It includes degenerative ("de novo") scoliosis that develops in later life, scoliosis carried over and worsening from adolescence, kyphotic (forward-bending) deformities, loss of the normal lumbar curve (sometimes called flatback), and deformity arising after previous spinal surgery. These are covered in more detail in the dedicated Adult Scoliosis and Kyphosis guides; this page focuses on the principles that tie them together — above all, alignment and balance.

A crucial difference from adolescent deformity is this: in a growing teenager, treatment is largely about the size and progression of the curve and its appearance. In an adult, the picture is dominated by symptoms — back pain, leg pain from trapped nerves, stooping forward, and the exhausting effort of staying upright — and by whether the spine is balanced. A modest-looking curve that has thrown the body out of balance can be far more disabling than a larger curve that remains well balanced.

In plain terms: the key question in adults is not just "how big is the curve?" but "is the spine still balanced over the pelvis, and can the person stand upright comfortably?"

To understand adult deformity, it helps to understand how a normal spine is built to balance the head and trunk over the pelvis with the least possible effort. Viewed from the side, the spine has gentle, opposing curves — an inward curve in the neck and lower back (lordosis) and an outward curve in the upper back (kyphosis). These curves are not random: they are tuned to the shape of the person's pelvis so that the head sits balanced over the hips and the body stands upright efficiently.

The sagittal plane is the side-on view, and sagittal alignment is the single most important factor in adult deformity. Surgeons describe it using a handful of measurements taken from full-length standing X-rays:

Pelvic incidence (PI) — a fixed, individual measurement of pelvic shape that essentially sets how much lower-back curve (lumbar lordosis) a given person needs. It does not change through adult life, and it is the anchor for planning.

Lumbar lordosis (LL) — the inward curve of the lower back. As a rule of thumb, the lordosis should roughly match the pelvic incidence; a large mismatch between the two (PI–LL mismatch) is strongly linked to pain and disability.

Pelvic tilt (PT) — how far the pelvis rotates backwards to compensate when the spine loses its curve. A high pelvic tilt is a sign the body is working hard to stay upright.

Sacral slope (SS) — the tilt of the top of the sacrum, which together with PI and PT describes the pelvis (PI = PT + SS).

Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) — a measure of how far forward the head and trunk have drifted in front of the pelvis. The further forward, the more the person is pitched into a stoop.

These ideas are organised in classifications such as the SRS–Schwab system, which grades a deformity by its curve type and by three sagittal "modifiers" (SVA, pelvic tilt and PI–LL mismatch) that have been shown again and again to correlate with quality of life. The Roussouly classification describes the normal range of sagittal shapes according to pelvic incidence, and helps explain why the right amount and distribution of lordosis differs from person to person.

When the lower-back curve is lost — through degeneration, flattening or previous surgery — the body does not give up. It compensates: it rotates the pelvis backwards (increasing pelvic tilt), bends the knees, and straightens the upper back to keep the eyes level and the body upright. This compensation works for a time, but it is tiring and eventually fails, leaving the person stooped forward and exhausted by the simple act of standing. Global alignment refers to the overall balance of the whole standing skeleton — spine, pelvis, hips and knees together — and it is this global picture, rather than any single curve, that best predicts how someone feels and functions.

In plain terms: a well-aligned spine balances the head over the pelvis like a stack of bricks, needing little muscular effort to stay upright. When alignment is lost, the body has to brace and stoop to stay level — which is exhausting and painful.

Degenerative ("de novo") scoliosis — a sideways curve that develops for the first time in a previously straight spine, driven by asymmetric wear of the discs and joints in middle and later life. It is frequently accompanied by spinal stenosis and nerve symptoms.

Adult idiopathic scoliosis — a curve that began in adolescence and has persisted or progressed into adulthood, now often with superimposed degeneration.

Kyphotic deformity — an excessive forward curve, which may be degenerative, post-traumatic, related to osteoporosis (multiple compression fractures), Scheuermann's, ankylosing spondylitis, or post-surgical. These are covered in the Kyphosis guide.

Iatrogenic / post-surgical deformity — deformity arising after previous spinal surgery, including loss of lumbar lordosis ("flatback") after fusion, and proximal junctional kyphosis above a fusion.

Sagittal imbalance / flatback — loss of the normal lower-back curve causing the trunk to pitch forward, often the most disabling pattern of all.

These types overlap, and many older patients have a combination — for example a degenerative scoliosis with loss of lordosis and stenosis together.

The common thread is age-related degeneration of the discs and facet joints, which, when it occurs asymmetrically, allows curves to develop and the lower-back curve to flatten. Contributing and aggravating factors include osteoporosis and compression fractures, previous spinal surgery, a pre-existing adolescent curve, inflammatory conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis, neuromuscular conditions affecting trunk control, and the general effects of ageing on muscle and bone. Deformity becomes more common with age and is an increasingly important cause of disability in older adults.

Adults with spinal deformity may experience:

Back pain and stiffness, often related to muscle fatigue from the effort of staying upright.

Leg pain, numbness or weakness, and neurogenic claudication (leg symptoms on walking that ease with sitting or leaning forward), from nerve compression and stenosis that commonly accompany degenerative curves.

A stooped posture or a sense of being pitched forward, with difficulty standing straight or looking ahead, and increasing reliance on a stick or trolley.

Fatigue and loss of stamina — tiring quickly when standing or walking because the muscles are working hard to compensate.

A change in shape or height, uneven shoulders or waist, or a rib prominence.

Difficulty with daily activities, and in advanced sagittal imbalance, problems with forward gaze and gait.

The degree of symptoms correlates better with loss of balance and with nerve compression than with the raw size of the curve.

Assessment combines a careful history and examination — including how the person stands and walks, whether the deformity is flexible or rigid, and a full neurological check — with specialised imaging:

Full-length standing (whole-spine) X-rays, ideally low-dose EOS imaging, are essential. Unlike scans taken lying down, standing films capture the spine under the load of gravity and allow the alignment parameters (PI, LL, PT, SS, SVA and PI–LL mismatch) to be measured. This is the cornerstone of deformity assessment.

MRI to assess the discs, nerves and any stenosis, and to plan decompression.

CT for detailed bone anatomy and surgical planning, particularly where osteotomies or instrumentation are considered.

Bone density (DEXA) assessment, because osteoporosis is common and strongly influences surgical planning and risk.

Flexibility films (bending or lying down) help determine how much of the deformity can be corrected.

Many adults with deformity are managed without surgery, particularly where symptoms are tolerable and balance is reasonably maintained. Non-surgical care includes structured physiotherapy and core and postural strengthening, activity modification, weight and general-health optimisation, treatment of osteoporosis, pain management, and selective injections for nerve-related leg pain. These measures manage symptoms and maintain function; they do not correct the deformity, but for many people they are enough.

Surgery is considered for deformity that causes significant, persistent pain or disability despite non-surgical care, for progressive deformity, for disabling nerve compression, and for substantial loss of balance — especially fixed forward stooping that prevents comfortable standing. The aims are to decompress trapped nerves, realign the spine (restoring lumbar lordosis and bringing the head back over the pelvis), and stabilise the correction with instrumentation and fusion. Achieving good sagittal alignment — correcting the PI–LL mismatch and SVA — is the strongest predictor of a good outcome.

Reconstructive deformity surgery is major surgery. Depending on the deformity it may involve fusion over several levels, and sometimes bone-cutting procedures (osteotomies) to correct rigid curves. It can transform quality of life in well-selected patients, but it carries meaningful risks, including a significant rate of complications and the need for further surgery — among them proximal junctional kyphosis (the spine bending forward just above a fusion), failure of the bone to unite, hardware problems, and the general risks of long operations in older patients. Careful patient selection, attention to bone quality, and realistic planning of alignment targets are central to getting it right.

Well-planned surgery can relieve nerve pain, restore a more upright, balanced posture, and substantially improve quality of life and independence. But expectations must be realistic: the goal is a balanced, comfortable, functional spine — not a "perfect" or youthful one — and recovery from major reconstruction is prolonged. The decision is always individualised, weighing the severity of symptoms and imbalance against the person's general health, bone quality and ability to undergo and recover from major surgery.

"It's just the size of the curve that matters." In adults, balance and alignment — and nerve compression — matter more than the raw curve size.

"A scan lying down shows the deformity." Deformity must be assessed standing, under gravity, on full-length films; lying-down scans understate it.

"Surgery straightens the spine like a teenager's." The aim in adults is a balanced, comfortable spine, not a perfectly straight one.

"Nothing can be done at my age." Many adults are helped by non-surgical care, and carefully selected older patients can benefit greatly from surgery.

"My posture is just old age." Progressive forward stooping is often a treatable deformity, not an inevitable part of ageing.

Adult spinal deformity is about more than the size of a curve: what matters most is whether the spine stays balanced over the pelvis, particularly in the side-on (sagittal) plane. Loss of the normal lower-back curve forces the body to compensate by tilting the pelvis and stooping forward, which is exhausting and painful. Assessment depends on full-length standing X-rays to measure alignment, alongside MRI for the nerves. Many people are managed well without surgery; for those with disabling symptoms, progressive deformity or significant imbalance, reconstructive surgery that decompresses the nerves and restores alignment can be life-changing — though it is major surgery with real risks, and success hinges on careful planning and patient selection.

This page is for general education and does not replace advice from your own clinical team. Seek prompt review if you develop significant or progressing leg weakness, numbness, or any disturbance of bladder or bowel control.

• —Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Scoliosis Research Society–Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine. 2012;37(12):1077–1082.
• —Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, et al. The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(4):559–568.
• —Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine. 2005;30(3):346–353.
• —Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, et al. Adult spinal deformity—postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine. 2010;35(25):2224–2231.
• —Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, et al. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine. 2005;30(18):2024–2029.
• —Diebo BG, Shah NV, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Adult spinal deformity. Lancet. 2019;394(10193):160–172.
• —Ames CP, Scheer JK, Lafage V, et al. Adult Spinal Deformity: Epidemiology, Health Impact, Evaluation, and Management. Spine Deformity. 2016;4(4):310–322.
• —Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. European Spine Journal. 2005;14(10):925–948.
• —Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, et al. Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine. 2016;41(1):62–68.
• —Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Bess S, et al. Recent and Emerging Advances in Spinal Deformity. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(3S):S70–S85.
• —Kim HJ, Yang JH, Chang DG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity: definition, classification, risk factors, and prevention strategies. Asian Spine Journal. 2022;16(3):440–450.

This information is for general patient education and is not a substitute for an individual consultation. Always seek personalised advice from a qualified spinal specialist.